Alibaba · 122B (10B active) · MoE
مزيج خبراء كبير متعدّد الوسائط. تعرّف على ما إذا كان كرت شاشتك أو جهاز الماك قادرًا على تشغيل Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B محليًا — 68.2 جيجابايت كحد أدنى، و113.6 جيجابايت موصى بها.
MoE
| Quantization | البتات | الذاكرة | الجودة | الحالة |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4_K_M | 4 | 63GB | جيدة | — |
| Q6_K | 6 | 94.2GB | ممتازة | — |
| Q8_0 | 8 | 125.5GB | ممتازة | — |
الأرقام تشمل الأوزان وذاكرة KV عند طول سياق 2K توكن. غيّر طول السياق من لوحة جهازك لترى أثره على الذاكرة والسرعة.
التطبيقات
شغّل Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B داخل أدوات البرمجة التي تعمل بالذكاء الاصطناعي — يشغّل الأمر خادم Ollama على جهازك، يحمّل النموذج، ثم يفتح الأداة موصولة به.
- Claude Code
وكيل البرمجة من Anthropic، يعمل في الطرفية وداخل المحرّر
ollama launch claude --model qwen3.5:122b-a10b - OpenCode
وكيل برمجة مفتوح المصدر يعمل في الطرفية داخل مستودعك
ollama launch opencode --model qwen3.5:122b-a10b - Codex
وكيل البرمجة من OpenAI في سطر الأوامر
ollama launch codex --model qwen3.5:122b-a10b - Droid
وكيل البرمجة من Factory، للمهام الطويلة عبر عدّة ملفات
ollama launch droid --model qwen3.5:122b-a10b - Hermes Agent
وكيل برمجة مفتوح من Nous Research، بذاكرة تمتد عبر الجلسات
ollama launch hermes --model qwen3.5:122b-a10b - OpenClaw
وكيل مفتوح المصدر يشغّل المهام على جهازك بلا خدمة سحابية
ollama launch openclaw --model qwen3.5:122b-a10b
تحتاج Ollama والأداة نفسها مثبَّتين. إن لم تكن الأداة مثبّتة، يرشدك الأمر إلى طريقة تثبيتها. اكتب ollama launch وحده لاختيار الأداة من قائمة.
عن هذا النموذج
الوصف الرسمي كما نشرته الجهة المطوِّرة، بلغته الأصلية.
Over recent months, we have intensified our focus on developing foundation models that deliver exceptional utility and performance. Qwen3.5 represents a significant leap forward, integrating breakthroughs in multimodal learning, architectural efficiency, reinforcement learning scale, and global accessibility to empower developers and enterprises with unprecedented capability and efficiency.
Highlights
Qwen3.5 features the following enhancement:
Unified Vision-Language Foundation: Early fusion training on multimodal tokens achieves cross-generational parity with Qwen3 and outperforms Qwen3-VL models across reasoning, coding, agents, and visual understanding benchmarks.
Efficient Hybrid Architecture: Gated Delta Networks combined with sparse Mixture-of-Experts deliver high-throughput inference with minimal latency and cost overhead.
Scalable RL Generalization: Reinforcement learning scaled across million-agent environments with progressively complex task distributions for robust real-world adaptability.
Global Linguistic Coverage: Expanded support to 201 languages and dialects, enabling inclusive, worldwide deployment with nuanced cultural and regional understanding.
Next-Generation Training Infrastructure: Near-100% multimodal training efficiency compared to text-only training and asynchronous RL frameworks supporting massive-scale agent scaffolds and environment orchestration.
Benchmarks
Language
| GPT5.2 | Claude 4.5 Opus | Gemini-3 Pro | Qwen3-Max-Thinking | K2.5-1T-A32B | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | ||||||
| MMLU-Pro | 87.4 | 89.5 | 89.8 | 85.7 | 87.1 | 87.8 |
| MMLU-Redux | 95.0 | 95.6 | 95.9 | 92.8 | 94.5 | 94.9 |
| SuperGPQA | 67.9 | 70.6 | 74.0 | 67.3 | 69.2 | 70.4 |
| C-Eval | 90.5 | 92.2 | 93.4 | 93.7 | 94.0 | 93.0 |
| Instruction Following | ||||||
| IFEval | 94.8 | 90.9 | 93.5 | 93.4 | 93.9 | 92.6 |
| IFBench | 75.4 | 58.0 | 70.4 | 70.9 | 70.2 | 76.5 |
| MultiChallenge | 57.9 | 54.2 | 64.2 | 63.3 | 62.7 | 67.6 |
| Long Context | ||||||
| AA-LCR | 72.7 | 74.0 | 70.7 | 68.7 | 70.0 | 68.7 |
| LongBench v2 | 54.5 | 64.4 | 68.2 | 60.6 | 61.0 | 63.2 |
| STEM | ||||||
| GPQA | 92.4 | 87.0 | 91.9 | 87.4 | 87.6 | 88.4 |
| HLE | 35.5 | 30.8 | 37.5 | 30.2 | 30.1 | 28.7 |
| HLE-Verified¹ | 43.3 | 38.8 | 48 | 37.6 | -- | 37.6 |
| Reasoning | ||||||
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 87.7 | 84.8 | 90.7 | 85.9 | 85.0 | 83.6 |
| HMMT Feb 25 | 99.4 | 92.9 | 97.3 | 98.0 | 95.4 | 94.8 |
| HMMT Nov 25 | 100 | 93.3 | 93.3 | 94.7 | 91.1 | 92.7 |
| IMOAnswerBench | 86.3 | 84.0 | 83.3 | 83.9 | 81.8 | 80.9 |
| AIME26 | 96.7 | 93.3 | 90.6 | 93.3 | 93.3 | 91.3 |
| General Agent | ||||||
| BFCL-V4 | 63.1 | 77.5 | 72.5 | 67.7 | 68.3 | 72.9 |
| TAU2-Bench | 87.1 | 91.6 | 85.4 | 84.6 | 77.0 | 86.7 |
| VITA-Bench | 38.2 | 56.3 | 51.6 | 40.9 | 41.9 | 49.7 |
| DeepPlanning | 44.6 | 33.9 | 23.3 | 28.7 | 14.5 | 34.3 |
| Tool Decathlon | 43.8 | 43.5 | 36.4 | 18.8 | 27.8 | 38.3 |
| MCP-Mark | 57.5 | 42.3 | 53.9 | 33.5 | 29.5 | 46.1 |
| Search Agent³ | ||||||
| HLE w/ tool | 45.5 | 43.4 | 45.8 | 49.8 | 50.2 | 48.3 |
| BrowseComp | 65.8 | 67.8 | 59.2 | 53.9 | --/74.9 | 69.0/78.6 |
| BrowseComp-zh | 76.1 | 62.4 | 66.8 | 60.9 | -- | 70.3 |
| WideSearch | 76.8 | 76.4 | 68.0 | 57.9 | 72.7 | 74.0 |
| Seal-0 | 45.0 | 47.7 | 45.5 | 46.9 | 57.4 | 46.9 |
| Multilingualism | ||||||
| MMMLU | 89.5 | 90.1 | 90.6 | 84.4 | 86.0 | 88.5 |
| MMLU-ProX | 83.7 | 85.7 | 87.7 | 78.5 | 82.3 | 84.7 |
| NOVA-63 | 54.6 | 56.7 | 56.7 | 54.2 | 56.0 | 59.1 |
| INCLUDE | 87.5 | 86.2 | 90.5 | 82.3 | 83.3 | 85.6 |
| Global PIQA | 90.9 | 91.6 | 93.2 | 86.0 | 89.3 | 89.8 |
| PolyMATH | 62.5 | 79.0 | 81.6 | 64.7 | 43.1 | 73.3 |
| WMT24++ | 78.8 | 79.7 | 80.7 | 77.6 | 77.6 | 78.9 |
| MAXIFE | 88.4 | 79.2 | 87.5 | 84.0 | 72.8 | 88.2 |
| Coding Agent | ||||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.0 | 80.9 | 76.2 | 75.3 | 76.8 | 76.2 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.0 | 77.5 | 65.0 | 66.7 | 73.0 | 69.3 |
| SecCodeBench | 68.7 | 68.6 | 62.4 | 57.5 | 61.3 | 68.3 |
| Terminal Bench 2 | 54.0 | 59.3 | 54.2 | 22.5 | 50.8 | 52.5 |
* HLE-Verified: a verified and revised version of Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE), accompanied by a transparent, component-wise verification protocol and a fine-grained error taxonomy. We open-source the dataset at https://huggingface.co/datasets/skylenage/HLE-Verified.
* TAU2-Bench: we follow the official setup except for the airline domain, where all models are evaluated by applying the fixes proposed in the Claude Opus 4.5 system card.
* MCPMark: GitHub MCP server uses v0.30.3 from api.githubcopilot.com; Playwright tool responses are truncated at 32k tokens.
* Search Agent: most search agents built on our model adopt a simple context-folding strategy(256k): once the cumulative Tool Response length reaches a preset threshold, earlier Tool Responses are pruned from the history to keep the context within limits.
* BrowseComp: we tested two strategies, simple context-folding achieved a score of 69.0, while using the same discard-all strategy as DeepSeek-V3.2 and Kimi K2.5 achieved 78.6.
* WideSearch: we use a 256k context window without any context management.
* MMLU-ProX: we report the averaged accuracy on 29 languages.
* WMT24++: a harder subset of WMT24 after difficulty labeling and rebalancing; we report the averaged scores on 55 languages using XCOMET-XXL.
* MAXIFE: we report the accuracy on English + multilingual original prompts (totally 23 settings).
* Empty cells (--) indicate scores not yet available or not applicable.
Vision Language
| GPT5.2 | Claude 4.5 Opus | Gemini-3 Pro | Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B | K2.5-1T-A32B | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEM and Puzzle | ||||||
| MMMU | 86.7 | 80.7 | 87.2 | 80.6 | 84.3 | 85.0 |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.5 | 70.6 | 81.0 | 69.3 | 78.5 | 79.0 |
| MathVision | 83.0 | 74.3 | 86.6 | 74.6 | 84.2 | 88.6 |
| Mathvista(mini) | 83.1 | 80.0 | 87.9 | 85.8 | 90.1 | 90.3 |
| We-Math | 79.0 | 70.0 | 86.9 | 74.8 | 84.7 | 87.9 |
| DynaMath | 86.8 | 79.7 | 85.1 | 82.8 | 84.4 | 86.3 |
| ZEROBench | 9 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| ZEROBench_sub | 33.2 | 28.4 | 39.0 | 28.4 | 33.5 | 41.0 |
| BabyVision | 34.4 | 14.2 | 49.7 | 22.2 | 36.5 | 52.3⁄43.3 |
| General VQA | ||||||
| RealWorldQA | 83.3 | 77.0 | 83.3 | 81.3 | 81.0 | 83.9 |
| MMStar | 77.1 | 73.2 | 83.1 | 78.7 | 80.5 | 83.8 |
| HallusionBench | 65.2 | 64.1 | 68.6 | 66.7 | 69.8 | 71.4 |
| MMBenchEN-DEV-v1.1 | 88.2 | 89.2 | 93.7 | 89.7 | 94.2 | 93.7 |
| SimpleVQA | 55.8 | 65.7 | 73.2 | 61.3 | 71.2 | 67.1 |
| Text Recognition and Document Understanding | ||||||
| OmniDocBench1.5 | 85.7 | 87.7 | 88.5 | 84.5 | 88.8 | 90.8 |
| CharXiv(RQ) | 82.1 | 68.5 | 81.4 | 66.1 | 77.5 | 80.8 |
| MMLongBench-Doc | – | 61.9 | 60.5 | 56.2 | 58.5 | 61.5 |
| CC-OCR | 70.3 | 76.9 | 79.0 | 81.5 | 79.7 | 82.0 |
| AI2D_TEST | 92.2 | 87.7 | 94.1 | 89.2 | 90.8 | 93.9 |
| OCRBench | 80.7 | 85.8 | 90.4 | 87.5 | 92.3 | 93.1 |
| Spatial Intelligence | ||||||
| ERQA | 59.8 | 46.8 | 70.5 | 52.5 | – | 67.5 |
| CountBench | 91.9 | 90.6 | 97.3 | 93.7 | 94.1 | 97.2 |
| RefCOCO(avg) | – | – | 84.1 | 91.1 | 87.8 | 92.3 |
| ODInW13 | – | – | 46.3 | 43.2 | – | 47.0 |
| EmbSpatialBench | 81.3 | 75.7 | 61.2 | 84.3 | 77.4 | 84.5 |
| RefSpatialBench | – | – | 65.5 | 69.9 | – | 73.6 |
| LingoQA | 68.8 | 78.8 | 72.8 | 66.8 | 68.2 | 81.6 |
| V* | 75.9 | 67.0 | 88.0 | 85.9 | 77.0 | 95.8⁄91.1 |
| Hypersim | – | – | – | 11.0 | – | 12.5 |
| SUNRGBD | – | – | – | 34.9 | – | 38.3 |
| Nuscene | – | – | – | 13.9 | – | 16.0 |
| Video Understanding | ||||||
| VideoMME(w sub.) | 86 | 77.6 | 88.4 | 83.8 | 87.4 | 87.5 |
| VideoMME(w/o sub.) | 85.8 | 81.4 | 87.7 | 79.0 | 83.2 | 83.7 |
| VideoMMMU | 85.9 | 84.4 | 87.6 | 80.0 | 86.6 | 84.7 |
| MLVU (M-Avg) | 85.6 | 81.7 | 83.0 | 83.8 | 85.0 | 86.7 |
| MVBench | 78.1 | 67.2 | 74.1 | 75.2 | 73.5 | 77.6 |
| LVBench | 73.7 | 57.3 | 76.2 | 63.6 | 75.9 | 75.5 |
| MMVU | 80.8 | 77.3 | 77.5 | 71.1 | 80.4 | 75.4 |
| Visual Agent | ||||||
| ScreenSpot Pro | – | 45.7 | 72.7 | 62.0 | – | 65.6 |
| OSWorld-Verified | 38.2 | 66.3 | – | 38.1 | 63.3 | 62.2 |
| AndroidWorld | – | – | – | 63.7 | – | 66.8 |
| Medical VQA | ||||||
| SLAKE | 76.9 | 76.4 | 81.3 | 54.7 | 81.6 | 79.9 |
| PMC-VQA | 58.9 | 59.9 | 62.3 | 41.2 | 63.3 | 64.2 |
| MedXpertQA-MM | 73.3 | 63.6 | 76.0 | 47.6 | 65.3 | 70.0 |
* MathVision:our model’s score is evaluated using a fixed prompt, e.g., “Please reason step by step, and put your final answer within \boxed{}.” For other models, we report the higher score between runs with and without the \boxed{} formatting.
* BabyVision: our model’s score is reported with CI (Code Interpreter) enabled; without CI, the result is 43.3.
* V*: our model’s score is reported with CI (Code Interpreter) enabled; without CI, the result is 91.1.
* Empty cells (--) indicate scores not yet available or not applicable.
أسئلة شائعة عن تشغيل Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B محليًا
- هل أستطيع تشغيل Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B على جهازي؟
- يحتاج Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B إلى 68.2 جيجابايت من الذاكرة كحد أدنى، والموصى به 113.6 جيجابايت. يكفي أن تفتح هذه الصفحة ليُقيَّم النموذج تلقائيًا أمام كرت شاشتك أو جهاز الماك، ثم تشغّله عبر Ollama أو LM Studio أو llama.cpp.
- كم يحتاج Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B من الـ VRAM؟
- بتكميم Q4_K_M يستهلك Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B نحو 63 جيجابايت من ذاكرة الكرت. أما المستويات الأعلى فتحتاج ذاكرة أكبر، والأدنى تناسب الكروت المحدودة مقابل تنازل في الجودة.